Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Review Article

Proposal of a linear rather than hierarchical evaluation of educational initiatives: the 7Is framework: Damian Roland; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12:35. Published online June 24, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.35

36,965 View
186 Download
10 Web of Science
11 Crossref

Extensive resources are expended attempting to change clinical practice; however, determining the effects of these interventions can be challenging. Traditionally, frameworks to examine the impact of educational interventions have been hierarchical in their approach. In this article, existing frameworks to examine medical education initiatives are reviewed and a novel ‘7Is framework’ discussed. This framework contains seven linearly sequenced domains: interaction, interface, instruction, ideation, integration, implementation, and improvement. The 7Is framework enables the conceptualization of the various effects of an intervention, promoting the development of a set of valid and specific outcome measures, ultimately leading to more robust evaluation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Conceptual Framework for Continuing Medical Education and Population Health
Abhimanyu Sud, Kate Hodgson, Gary Bloch, Ross Upshur
Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2022; 34(5): 541. CrossRef
Educational programs and teaching strategies for health professionals responding to women with complex perinatal mental health and psychosocial concerns: A scoping review
Louise Everitt, Virginia Stulz, Rakime Elmir, Virginia Schmied
Nurse Education in Practice.2022; 60: 103319. CrossRef
A systematic scoping review of teaching and evaluating communications in the intensive care unit
Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Huixin Huang, Sherill Goh, Marlyn Tracy Peries, Charlotte Cheuk Yiu Lee, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Kuang Teck Tay, Yun Ting Ong, Wei Qiang Lim, Xiu Hui Tan, Yao Hao Tan, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Annelissa Mien Chew Chi
The Asia Pacific Scholar.2021; 6(1): 3. CrossRef
198 A Novel ‘Virtual Simulation’ for The Advanced Life Support Group, Making a Dream a Reality: A Beginner’s Guide
Carl Leith Van Heyningen, Kate Denning, Sibi Joseph
International Journal of Healthcare Simulation.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Changes in academic performance in the online, integrated system-based curriculum implemented due to the COVID-19 pandemic in a medical school in Korea
Do-Hwan Kim, Hyo Jeong Lee, Yanyan Lin, Ye Ji Kang
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 24. CrossRef
In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review
Daniel Goldshtein, Cole Krensky, Sachin Doshi, Vsevolod S. Perelman
BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning.2020; 6(1): 3. CrossRef
Critical analysis of evidence about the impacts on surgical teams of ‘mental practice’ in systematic reviews: a systematic rapid evidence assessment (SREA)
Huon Snelgrove, Ben Gabbott
BMC Medical Education.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Interprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review
Chermaine Bok, Cheng Han Ng, Jeffery Wei Heng Koh, Zhi Hao Ong, Haziratul Zakirah Binte Ghazali, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Yun Ting Ong, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
BMC Medical Education.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Have we forgotten to teach how to think?
Damian Roland
Emergency Medicine Journal.2017; 34(2): 68. CrossRef
Implementation of effective practices in health facilities: a systematic review of cluster randomised trials
Emma R Allanson, Özge Tunçalp, Joshua P Vogel, Dina N Khan, Olufemi T Oladapo, Qian Long, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
BMJ Global Health.2017; 2(2): e000266. CrossRef
A qualitative study of self-evaluation of junior doctor performance: is perceived ‘safeness’ a more useful metric than confidence and competence?
Damian Roland, David Matheson, Timothy Coats, Graham Martin
BMJ Open.2015; 5(11): e008521. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search